I think what we’re discovering is that at times the
gap between anthropocentric and holistic views is oftentimes more subtle than we
might initially expect. I found Alasdair
Cochrane’s Environmental Ethics page at I.E.P.
Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, an invaluable resource tool for
working out the distinctions of at times difficult and nuanced arguments.
I think you've pointed out something important: that the gap between anthropocentric theories and non-anthropocentric theories isn't as bold as we always assume. The difference between the two is basically the point of view/origination (humans or environment). But I think it's important to remember that humans are a part of the environment as well, so non-anthropocentric theories include humans, as opposed to keeping humans and environment separate as two entities.
ReplyDelete